Dr. Hauschka Growing Cosmetics in the Garden

28 06 2008

 To learn a little more about the Dr. Hauschka cosmetic line’s origins and business ideals, etc, check out this New York Times Article about Dr Hauschka’s cosmetics. 

Here’s a little excerpt:

“Mr. Steiner’s thinking [Mr. Steiner is apparently an Austrian anthroposophist] was also influential in more down-to-earth matters. He championed biodynamic agriculture, a rigorous form of organic farming that shuns pesticides and uses no fertilizers that were not already present in the garden. An acolyte of Mr. Steiner, Rudolf Hauschka planted a biodynamic garden in this town, 28 miles west of Stuttgart, in 1955. There, a team of eight gardeners cultivates more than 150 plants, flowers and trees, ranging from Echinacea to monk’s hood. They are harvested by hand, then crushed and dried. Extracts are taken with water, never alcohol.For the company’s rose cream, one of its signature products, it buys large amounts of rose oil from suppliers in Turkey, Bulgaria, Iran and Afghanistan. The trade allows WALA to engage in more planetary good works. In Afghanistan, it is encouraging farmers to plant roses in place of opium poppies, said Antal Adam, the chief spokesman.”



What Happens to Books When They Die?

6 06 2008

Who said literature and knowledge were eternal?

As I mentioned in a previous post about the environmental impacts of the publishing industry , the archaic return policies of the book industry lead to millions of books being pulped or landfilled every year.

According to Bloombergnews.com, “In 2005, roughly 1.5 billion books were shipped in the U.S. … Of those, 465 million, or 31 percent, were returned to publishers.” That’s a whole lotta not only paper waste, but carbon emissions!

So what happens to these books after they die? Joe Moran of the Guardian says, pulped books can be turned into “bitumen modifier, the pellets roadbuilders use to bind blacktop to aggregate. A mile of motorway consumes about 45,000 books” and also fake snow…weird, huh?



Stylish Vegan Shoes and Bags

6 06 2008

I still wear leather shoes and leather purses, but since I indulge my shoe obsession through thrift stores, vintage stores and ebay, I don’t feel any guilt.

Besides, I’ve long lamented the fact that it seems like most places who market themselves as makers and sellers of vegan shoes had too hippie of a look. I love the idea of total sustainability in shoes, and yes, maybe that makes me a bad person that I just can’t hang with  many of the ugly shoes that are the best for the earth.

There is hope. Here are some websites where you don’t have to sacrifice style for ideals 

Vegetarian Shoes and Bags: www.vegetarianshoesandbags.com

Moo Shoes: www.mooshoes.com

Alternative Outiftters: www.alternativeoutfitters.com

And then, PETA’s list of Vegan Clothing Companies  



Environmental Impacts of the Publishing Industry

5 06 2008

So, I’m writing a research paper for one of my classes about the environmental impacts of the publishing industry, and here are some of the things I’ve learned. 

The Publishing Industry’s Return Policy 

Starting in the depression era, the industry established what is now an illogical practice: the return policy. While it made sense at the time, it now has bizarre repercussions.  Basically, publishers are forced by this practice to put their books into bookstores on consignment, which has good and bad results. The good thing about this is that bookstores potentially take risks on books because they know they can just send the books back to the publisher if they don’t sell. The bad thing about this is that if bookstores ask for 10,000 books, but only sell 500, they send back the remainder to the publishers, which are then pulped, recycled, or destroyed. Yes it’s bad because this overprinting followed by a return has put publishers out of business in the past, but also — think about the environmental waste of all of this!

Recycled Paper and the Publishing Industry’s Carbon Footprint

In trying to research the return policy conundrum of the publishing industry, I was surprised by how little has been written about the wasteful practice. Most information that I’ve been able to find has been about the use of recycled paper and the carbon footprint of the publishing industry.

Here’s a little quote from The Exchange Online, the Newsletter of the Association of University Presses
The U.S. book industry emits 12.4 million metric tons of carbon per year, or a net 8.85 pounds per book. Steps the industry is beginning to take to reduce this load include increasing the use of recycled or environmentally sustainable papers, reducing overproduction, and reducing office and plant energy use.”

And here’s a link to an    interview with the Green Press Initiative’s Director

Several big publishing companies like Random House and Scholastic have made commitments to use more recycled paper, which is a step in the right direction, although reducing the wasteful attitude of “More, more, more” and “Profit is king,” would be more effective. (P.S. The latest Harry Potter book got a bit of press for being printed on recycled paper, did you hear?)

Print on Demand Kiosks

I don’t know how long it would take to make this dream a reality, but I’m excited about the idea of print-on-demand kiosks! Currently, printing on demand is used by those who want to self publish, or those who are publishing in small numbers, like for academic books. Think about the waste that this process would eliminate!

Here’s a link about a print on demand in action in Australia 

And here’s an article about the print on demand kiosk for the New York Public Library

The Kindle

At first I thought the Kindle (those little digital reader thingies) might be a solution for reducing waste in the publishing industry, but now I’m not so sure. It seems like the Kindle would reduce paper waste, but then I could forsee plastic waste being an issue. Will people really want to read their books on digital screens in the future? To date it’s not been the success the industry predicted it would be…I guess we’ll just have to wait and see!!!



Dr. Hauschka and His Magic Nontoxic Makeup!

13 05 2008

After scouring the internet for endless hours, researching what make up was the best and least toxic, again and again I came across the brand name Dr. Hauschka.

(If you don’t know about the horrible chemicals that mainstream makeup companies are encouraging women to spread on their faces and bodies, check out my other post about Toxic Makeup, with links for further reading.)

I had first tried Zuzu brand eye makeup that I bought at Whole Foods, and though I liked the mascara, the eyeliner was horrible! An hour after application it was smeared all over my lids and down my cheeks.

The other day I saw that Whole Foods had started carrying Dr. Hauschka cosmetics, and though the eyeliner cost a small fortune (well, it’s all relative, but paying close to $30 for eyeliner is a lot for me.) However, I LOVE Dr. Hauschka’s eyeliner!! You can purchase his products cheaper online too.

Here’s a link to the ingredient list of Dr. Hauschka’s products.

Check out the website, and stop spreading toxic sludge on your face!

www.drhauschka.com




A Classy Trashy Look?

13 05 2008

This is a pretty interesting little article on cnn.com about designers turning trash into fashion. I think the funniest part is where it mentions Target objecting to the re-use of their plastic shopping bag on the Timbuk2 recycled bag. So, they reject to the use of their plastic bags for others’ profit, but what steps are they taking to recycle their own bags? The only good thing about Target plastic bags is that they’re more durable that grocery store plastic bags so you can re-use them, but the amount of plastic bags I see in trees on a daily basis makes me nauseous.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/05/13/trashy.fashion/index.html

MIAMI, Florida (CNN) — Fashion designers are giving new life to worthless candy wrappers, newspapers and plastic bags; turning trash into trendy tote bags, purses and jewelry.

 

 

 

art.timbuk2.jpg

 

Target stores objected to this Timbuk2 purse which included plastic bags with its bull’s-eye logo.

 

From “post-consumer and industrial waste” comes durable, funky accessories reportedly worn by celebrities such as Lindsay Lohan, Cameron Diaz and Petra Nemcova.

One self-described eco-fashion label, Ecoist, has partnered with Coca-Cola, Luna Bar, and Aveda to create handbags made from misprinted and discontinued packaging.

“We tap into that source of waste because it is reliable and unfortunately it’s abundant,” said Ecoist co-founder Jonathan Marcoschamer. “We believe that for the next few years there’s going to be a significant amount.”

How about 7.6 billion tons of waste? That’s how much trash American companies toss each year, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

During the past four years, Ecoist said, it has sold more than 100,000 accessories created by its designers in Peru and Miami, Florida. The bags — some of them one-of-a-kind — are priced from about $30 for smaller versions to about $180 for larger ones.

“For now, we’re an immediate solution for many of these companies to utilize waste for something that’s creative and promotes environmental awareness,” said Marcoschamer.

 

Ecoist isn’t alone. Katherine Rasmussen, owner of the label Reiter8, creates totes from recycled boat sails. Nicola Freegard and Robin Janson, the design team behind Vy&Elle, have recycled 100 tons of vinyl billboard ads to create wallets, bags and a variety of other products. Another designer, Anna Built, has opted to create jewelry from recycled tin cans.

But it’s not always easy being green. Timbuk2, a company famous for its messenger bags, has encountered resistance in its attempt to produce totes made from discarded plastic bags.

The idea seemed feasible when Timbuk2 formed a partnership with RootPhi, which developed a machine capable of bonding plastic bags together. The machine, called the Lamitron, allowed them to produce a new fabric while maintaining the visual details of the original plastic bag.

The timing seemed appropriate; San Francisco had banned the use of plastic bags, and other cities worldwide were considering similar initiatives.

Despite a following of some 3,000 potential customers on the Timbuk2 Web site, the bags are unlikely to be sold any time soon, if at all. The companies have encountered legal and technical hiccups in their efforts to mass produce the bags. “Everyone is afraid to be the large-scale manufacturer, to stick their toe in the water. It’s a risk and a cost issue,” says Doug Patt, co-founder of RootPhi.

Tinbuk2 also found that, while trash may no longer have an owner, logos on trash still do. Target sent Timbuk2 a cease and desist letter last September when they discovered that some Lamitron bags contained the company’s bull’s-eye design. RootPhi and Timbuk2 scrambled to identify and remove the offending bags from its limited collection of prototypes.

“We encourage and promote recycling efforts, including ones that use our recycled bags,” said Target in a written statement to CNN. “However, in this particular case we believed that the prominent use of our bull’s-eye design mark implied a sponsorship or affiliation with Timbuk2 that did not exist at that time.” Target said Timbuk2 has cooperated.

Perry Klebahn, Timbuk2’s CEO, acknowledges that Target wasn’t technically wrong. “The onus was on us to talk to Target and get them to say OK, in this particular case, to grant us a license. If we really are going to make use of this, we should be responsible as the manufacturer.”

However, the initial draw for Timbuk2 was the possibility that it could simultaneously clean up neighborhoods and satisfy a market demand for highly localized and personalized eco-products. “What’s great here is that no two bags are the same… What if you could roll into a town and make artifacts that have a local flavor?” Klebahn said.

His vision was that one day anyone could drop off their used shopping bags at Timbuk2 and receive a customized tote bag a few weeks later. For now, the masses will have to wait.

Eco-fashion has certainly proven it has enough caché in the fashion world. Last year, British designer Anya Hindmarch created an instant eco-fad with her $15, limited edition “I Am Not A Plastic Bag” bag. The cotton bags quickly sold out in London and New York — with hundreds of people lining up for them. The bags even fetched $400 on eBay and spawned a dizzying number of knock-offs.

Atlanta, Georgia, boutique owner Joyce Justicz said she doesn’t think consumers buy eco-fashion exclusively for environmental reasons. “They buy them because they’re cute and it’s an added bonus,” she said.

 

 

Will the trend last? Yair Marcoschamer, another Ecoist co-founder, is optimistic.

“Businesses and individuals have realized that if something isn’t done [about the environment], this is going to have a profound effect on each of our lives,” he said. “Consuming products that are fair-trade, that are environmentally responsible, is our responsibility as consumers.”




Product Review: Burt’s Bees Soap Bark and Chamomile Deep Cleansing Cream

8 02 2008

So, until I perfect homemade recipes for soaps and shampoos and lotions and such, I’m testing out natural products as a way to make my life more chemical free. I decided to post reviews here, so you can find unbiased details on products for your face and body.

First, a fun fact: Did you know Burt’s Bees was bought out by Clorox?

And now, onto the review of Burt’s Bees Soap Bark and Chamomile Deep Cleansing Cream.

Burt's Bees Deep Cleansing Cream

I currently use Cetaphil to wash my face, and I love it! But I want to use a more natural product, and I love Burt’s Bees…

The Deep Cleansing Cream though…I didn’t like it as a face wash. It was ok. The cream had an invigorating tingly mint thing going for it, but I felt like it didn’t fully wash off my face. In the interest of not being wasteful, I used up the rest of the container as a shaving cream, and for that, it was fine. I would probably not buy the Deep Cleansing Cream again.




Stainless Steel Water Bottles Rule!

13 01 2008

I finally got around to purchasing a stainless steel water bottle, after learning more about the dangers of Nalgene bottles.

stainless steel water bottle

I got mine at Whole Foods for around $25. The reason I chose this particular one over others was because the mouth on this one is big enough that I can stick a scrub brush down in there (whereas the mouth on other bottles was too small). It even comes with green cleaning instructions - one need only use baking soda or vinegar. You can get one like mine at www.enviroproductsinc.com.

My coworker recommends buying a steel bottle from the company Klean Kanteen, as they donate a portion of their profits towards conservation.

Another brand of metal water bottles I found at an outdoorsy store as well as Whole Foods was the brand Sigg. The Sigg bottles came in the most exciting designs, like classy flowers, Spongebob, pirates, and cheesy tribal tattoos. A little something for everyone!




Toxins in Makeup? That’s Mad as a Hatter.

1 01 2008

Did you know that the phrase “mad hatter” comes from the fact that hats used to be made with mercury that caused the hatters to go insane?

Mercury poisoning causes tremors, brain damage, and slurred speech, and is easily absorbed by skin and accumulates in the body.

And yet, it’s legal to have mercury in makeup products. In fact, it commonly appears in mascaras.

Although it seems outrageous that people shampooed with petrol in the 19th century, causing hair to easily light aflame, and it’s horrifying to imagine vermin living in little washed hairdos and wigs styled with lard, the makeup industry seems not to have progressed as far as one might think.

Carbon tetrachloride was also used to wash hair, causing results similar to inhaling chloroform in the 19th century. This seems bizarre, and yet freakin’ formaldehyde is released by several products found in deodorants and makeups under such names as Imidazolidinyl urea and DMDM Hydantoin.

Victorian women suffered massive scalp injuries and health problems by dying their hair with mixtures containing sulphur, lead, ammonia, and gylercine, among other things. Sounds like the ingredients of a bomb!

And yet, chemicals equally as toxic still exist today in not only hair dyes, but products we smear on our mouths and faces every day! Sodium Laurel Sulphate is mixed with sulfur trioxide or chlorosulforic acid and then neutralized with aqueous sodium hydroxide, appearing in most toothpastes, deodorants, and cleansers.

It’s estimated that our bodies absorb around 5 pounds of chemicals per year from makeup and lotions and hair care products…products proven to cause birth defects, neurological damage, even depression and blindness!

Check out:
An interesting look at the wacky history of toxic hair care through the ages.
More on different chemicals in makeup.
Consumer Reports on phthalates.




A Quick Reference for Toxic Makeup

31 12 2007

Maybe you’ve heard all the press about lead in lipstick or L’oreal’s assertation that mercury is perfectly acceptable in mascara…

Just wanted to put up a quick post with a searchable list of companies who are producing safer makeup for your browsing pleasure: click Safer Cosmetics.

Also, apparently the state of Minnesota has banned mercury in mascara: click Minnesota Bans Mercury.

And, since the US has no regulations on the truth that makeup claims of “natural” or “organic” really are, it’s best to purchase organic makeup from Europe where regulations exist: click Buy European Organic Makeup







Close
E-mail It